1) What was the biggest surprise for you in the reading? In other words, what did you read that stood out the most as different from your expectations?
The part of the reading I found to be most different from my expectations is that, “adults use only 2 to 10 percent of their creative potential” (Kuratko, 162). 2 to 10 percent of our creative potential is so minuscule, yet we still have so many great inventions in our society. This leads me to believe that if people focus on using more of their creative potential, we would have even better inventions.
2) Identify at least one part of the reading that was confusing to you.
Phase two of the creative process was a little confusing to me. The way in which Kuratoko described the incubation process was unclear. However, the other three phases I understood.
3) If you were able to ask two questions to the author, what would you ask? Why?
a. Do you agree with the concept of probability thinking?
I would ask Kuratko this question because I do not agree with the concept so I would be curious to
hear his opinion.
b. What do you think is the most common form of creativity: idea, material, organization,
relationship, event, inner, or spontaneous?
I would ask Kuratoko his opinion because I value it.
4) Was there anything you think the author was wrong about? Where do you disagree with what she or he said? How?
I do not think Kuratko was wrong about anything in this chapter.
